Analysis
of my data.
Which data you chose and why?
I chose to transcribe the data in the video called ‘Geordie
Shore: Ricci and Vicky talk weddings and shocking.’ I chose
to use this data as I find the way men and women speak differently interesting
so this one seemed perfect. It would also broaden my knowledge and
understanding on the subject by looking at the theories related to it.
What you
found and what theory you linked it to
To me, listening and
watching this video made it seemed as though the couple Ricci and Vicky may
have rehearsed and practiced what they were going to say as it seems to be a
promotional video for their TV programme Geordie shore. So they avoided being
crude and inappropriate. Showing that this could of in fact have known exactly
what to say throughout the interview. Looking through the theorists and their
theories I decided to relate my findings to language and gender theorist Robin
Lakoff. In 1975 Lakoff published an account of women’s language. She published
a set of assumptions that were to show the differences between men and women’s
language use. Since they are different sexes, it is a lot easier to compare the
range of language they use and how it changes when either of them is speaking.
For example Vicky uses hedging ‘we have a sort of like’ would be one of the
examples of when she has used it in the transcript.
What other
data you could choose to go with it or replace it with to make an investigation
In order to investigate the difference theory rather than looking at the
Geordie shore transcript I would create a more natural atmosphere and sit with
a group of girls and record their conversation then onto a group of boys and
record their conversation. I would then transcribe both conversations and
analysis and pick out the differences between the lexis, phrases etc. that they
use.
What you
would call that investigation
Women are from venus, men are from
mars but is their language in sync?
Good analysis you have really picked up on the key points a presented them well
ReplyDeleteGood explanation, however if you went more in depth with your points it would be alot better.
ReplyDeleteWayyy nice work girl. Good analysis
ReplyDelete